1General remarks:

 

This questionnaire helps to evaluate the quality of physics lectures. This week it will be distributed in every lecture. 
The results of the survey will be posted on the notice board in the foyer and passed to the respective lecturers. So this is one of the few opportunities to tell your instructors your opinion on his or her lecture.
Please return the complete form to the Physics Students' Society until the end of this term. 

2Personal Data:

2.1Your program of study is: 

2.2

How frequently do you attend to the lectures?

always

never


 

2.3How much time per week do you spend on reworking the lecture notes and on exercises?

2.4 In what other ways do you deal with the subject matter?


3Subject Matter:

3.1

How difficult are the lectures?

too easy

too difficult


 

3.2

How much subject matter is covered by the lecture?

not enough

too much


 

3.3

How well are the topics selected?

balanced

unbalanced


 

3.4

Does the lecturer make a skilled impression?

very skilled

hardly


 

3.5

Does the lecturer arouse interest in the subject matter?

always

never


 

3.6

Is the lecturer able to answer additional questions?

all

none


 

3.7

Does the lecturer show connections/links to current research projects?

frequently

rarely


 

3.8

Do you understand the subject matter just by attending the lecture?

completely

hardly


 

4Didactics:

4.1

How well is the lecture structured? 

well

badly


 

4.2

Are connections made clear?

always

never


 

4.3

How well is the distinction made between important and less important parts?

well

hardly


 

4.4

Are there enough examples on concepts?

too few

too much


 

4.5

Do these help in understanding the subject matter?

indeed

not at all


 

4.6

Does the lecturer get the students involved during the lectures (e.g. by inciting questions,...)?

often

never


 

4.7

Does the lecturer appear committed to the lectures?

very much

hardly


 

4.8

Does the lecturer deliver compressible and understandable lectures?

always

never


 

 
 
 
 
 
 

5Technique:

5.1

How fast is the subject matter presented?

too slow

too fast


 

5.2

How well can you hear the lecturer speaking?

very well

hardly


 

5.3

Does the lecturer's manner of speaking help to understand the material?

yes

no


 

5.4

How are the lecture notes?

clear

chaotic


 

5.5

Can you read the notes of the lecturer?

always

hardly


 

5.6

Does the lecturer use aids (e.g. transparencies,...)?

often

never


 

5.7

Do they help you understand the subject matter?

always

hardly


 

5.8

Can you follow the lecture?

always

seldom


 

6Exercises/Tutorials:

6.1

How frequently do you attend the tutorials?

always

never


 

6.2

Do they assist in understanding the subject matter?

very much

hardly


 

6.3

 What do you think of the exercises? They are...

too easy

too difficult


 

6.4

How are the problems posed?

clearly

incomprehensible


 

6.5

Is you tutor motivated?

very motivated

unmotivated


 

6.6

How well can your tutor give explanations?

very well

hardly


 

6.7

Does your tutor understand the subject matter?

always

seldom


 

7Overall Rating of the Lecture:

7.1

Subject Matter (Contents)

very good

poor


 

7.2

Didactics (delivery of subject matter)

very good

poor


 

7.3

Overall impression

very good

poor


 

8Comments:

8.1


8.2


9Teaching Material:

9.1


 
 

Thank you very much for your participation!